SNAP Reports

I want to share this article which highlights public service and policies which have a profound impact on American families. Cutbacks of USDA service which the current administration campaigned in 2016 and now #election2020 would rebuild America. The reports shows signs our nation’s families as well as children outcomes with SNAP.

White House

Trump’s tweeted comments have a profound impact in Washington, DC; leader and discussion attacks social programs. Once before supporting then 180 degree change. Services and benefit of which President Trump’s base use,yet somehow believe Trump’s speeches (no value for their own business,families, and children). How it’s possible not to consider how the economy may be effected when programs are defunded, and public policies change the very value most important to Republican’s base? In the report which is included in my blog makes for a comprehensive review of the current policy set by President Trump’s administration. Please keep in mind, the Trump’s campaign has focused on systemic disruption of public service agencies and departments which families depend. Whereas depicting social programs (example SNAP) via USDA budget as governmental waste by President Trump Including cabinet members regaining thus far. In recent weeks increasing restrictions for clients as well as state administrative regulations.

Our Priority for Republican candidates

Please read this article below. It has key components which Both political leaders should keep mindful #election2020.

Supplemental Poverty Measure Shows State-Level Impact of Food and Poverty

SNAP moved 3.1 million people out of poverty in 2018


The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reduced poverty by just over 1 percentage point for the three-year period from 2016 to 2018, according to data released by the U.S. Census Bureau today.

The Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) shows that SNAP – formerly known as food stamps – cut the poverty rate from 14.3% to 13.2%. This means that with SNAP benefits, an average 3.5 million fewer people were living below the poverty line during that three-year period.

However, there are notable state-level variations; New Mexico, Louisiana and Mississippi were among the states where SNAP had the greatest anti-poverty impact (see Table 1 and Figure 1).  

Why SPM is Important

The SPM allows us to gauge the potential magnitude of the effect of tax credits and transfers in alleviating poverty.  

The SPM, an alternative to the official poverty measure, considers the value of noncash government transfers, taxes, and necessary expenses into the resources a family has available to meet their basic needs.

Figure 8 in the 2018 SPM Report released today shows how each element, including SNAP, impacts the estimated number of people below the supplemental poverty threshold.

By subtracting the value of SNAP from resources and recalculating poverty rates (assuming no behavioral changes and all else constant), we can show how many people would have been in poverty in the absence of SNAP.

How does SNAP Reduce Poverty across the Country?

SNAP is a nutritional assistance program that aims to help low-income families afford a nutritionally balanced diet. Among the additions to resources considered by the SPM, SNAP has consistently been among the most impactful noncash transfer.

SNAP is estimated to have prevented approximately 3.1 million people from falling into poverty in 2018 and an average of 3.5 million across 2016-2018.

To create state-level estimates using the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC), the Census Bureau recommends using 3-year averages for additional statistical reliability.

The 3-year average poverty rate for the United States in 2016-2018 was 13.2% using the SPM. Subtracting out the value of SNAP allows us to estimate that SNAP benefits decreased the SPM rate by slightly above 1 percentage point, from 14.3% to 13.2%.

This means that with SNAP benefits, 3.5 million fewer people were living below the poverty line.

State-by-State Impact

SNAP is estimated to have decreased the SPM rate in 42 of the 50 states and in the District of Columbia by a value that is greater than or not significantly different than 1 percentage point.

Figure 1 above illustrates the impact of SNAP benefits on SPM poverty by state.

New Mexico, Louisiana and Mississippi were among the states where SNAP had the greatest anti-poverty impact, decreasing each state’s SPM rate by 2.3, 1.9 and 1.8 percentage points, respectively.

Impact on Child Poverty

Children under age 18 are the largest age group receiving SNAP. The program is estimated to have decreased the SPM rate for children by 2.0 percentage points on average, from 16.5% to 14.5%.

Again, New Mexico, Louisiana and Mississippi were among the states most affected by SNAP. The program decreased the child poverty rate of each state by 4.5, 3.8 and 3.4 percentage points, respectively.

The map below illustrates the percentage point decrease in the SPM rate among children within each state.

SNAP had less of an impact on the national SPM rate of adults between the ages of 18 and 64 and those 65 years or older.

For the United States, SNAP reduced SPM poverty for adults 18 to 64 years by 0.8 percentage points (from 13.5% to 12.7%) and by 0.6 percentage points (from 14.2 to 13.6) for adults aged 65 and over.

See Table 1 below for a list of the 10 states whose populations were most affected by SNAP.  See Tables 1a-1d (pdf) for full details.

Danielle Wilson is an intern and Liana Fox is a survey statistician in the Social, Economic and Housing Statistics Division at the Census Bureau.

Also Released Today

STORY | SEPTEMBER 10, 2019Payday, Poverty, and WomenBetween 2017 and 2018, women working full-time, year-round experienced a significant gain in median earnings but more women than men live in poverty.

2020 Census in the ClassroomGaps in the Wealth of Americans by Household TypeAre Women Really Opting Out of Work After They Have Babies?Your Health Care Is in Women’s HandsFrom Horseback to Satellite, How U.S. Census Bureau Checks AddressesWhere Do College Graduates Go For Jobs

America Counts tells the stories behind the numbers in a new inviting way. We feature stories on various topics such as families, housing, employment, business, education, the economy, emergency preparedness, and population. Contact our Public Information Office for media inquiries or interviews.

Use the hashtag #AmericaCounts to share this story on social media.This story was posted in: Income and Poverty

Tags: Income and Poverty Supplemental Poverty MeasureINCOME AND POVERTYPoverty Rate for People in Female-Householder Families Lowest on RecordThe U.S. poverty rate dropped from 12.3% in 2017 to 11.8% in 2018. The decrease in poverty for women-led families comprised much of this decline.INCOME AND POVERTYU.S. Median Household Income Was $63,179 in 2018, Not Significantly Different From 2017U.S. Census Bureau released 2018 income, poverty and health insurance statistics today. Survey redesigns make comparing statistics from prior years challenging.HEALTHUninsured Rate for Children Up to 5.5 Percent in 2018Overall, the uninsured rate for children rose in 2018, driven by a decline in the percentage of children with public coverage, such as Medicaid.Stay ConnectedCensus JobsInformation QualityData Linkage InfrastructureData Protection and Privacy PolicyAccessibilityFOIAU.S. Department of

Measuring America’s People, Places, and EconomyX  Is this page helpful?

Thumbs Up Image


Thumbs Down Image